EU Case Law

Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (…), must be interpreted as meaning that: –  the relevant criterion for the purposes of the application of that article is identity of the material acts, understood as the existence of a set of facts which are inextricably linked together, irrespective of the legal classification given to them or the legal interest...

Mr Hassan has asked the Court of First Instance to annul the Council regulations which included them in the Community terrorist list. The Court of First Instance concludes that there are no...

The Court of First Instance clarifies the rights of individuals whose funds have been frozen in connection with the fight against international terrorism. First of all, the Court of First...

The Court annuls the Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of personal data and...

The ne bis in idem principle, enshrined in Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (…), must be applied to criminal proceedings brought in a Contracting State for acts for...

The Court of First Istance dismisses the action of Mr Selmani as manifestly inadmissible.

M. Yusuf and others were designated by the Sanctions Committee of the UN as being associated with Usama bin Laden. The Council implemented that blacklist with Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002...