Find EU Case Law

EU Case Law

Peter Puškár

In this case, the Court (Second Chamber) ruled : 1. Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation, which makes the exercise of a judicial remedy by a person stating that his right to protection of personal data guaranteed by Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council...
Read more

Trayan Beshkov

On 21 September 2017, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) delivered its judgment in case C-171/16, on Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in...
Read more

Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR

Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner, a law firm established in Munich (Germany), invited Mr Adelsmayr, an Austrian physician residing in Austria, to speak in January 2015 at a conference on...
Read more

Tadas Tupikas

On 10 August 2017, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) delivered its judgment in case C-270/17 PPU, on the interpretation of Article 4a (1) of the EAW Framework Decision. A Lithuanian...
Read more

Sławomir Andrzej Zdziaszek

On 10 August 2017, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) delivered its judgment in case C-271/17 PPU, on the interpretation of 4a(1) of the EAW Framework Decision. A Polish court issued an...
Read more

Opinion 1/15 EU-Canada PNR Agreement

On 26 July 2017, the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) delivered its opinion on the agreement envisaged between the EU and Canada on the transfer of Passenger Name Record data (PNR agreement). It...
Read more

M.A.S. and M.B. (Taricco follow-up)

On 18 July 2017, Advocate General Bot delivered his opinion on case C-42/17. Following the Taricco judgment, the Italian Court of Cassation and the Court of Appeal of Milan, before which...
Read more